150 research outputs found
Requirements Problem and Solution Concepts for Adaptive Systems Engineering, and their Relationship to Mathematical Optimisation, Decision Analysis, and Expected Utility Theory
Requirements Engineering (RE) focuses on eliciting, modelling, and analyzing
the requirements and environment of a system-to-be in order to design its
specification. The design of the specification, usually called the Requirements
Problem (RP), is a complex problem solving task, as it involves, for each new
system-to-be, the discovery and exploration of, and decision making in, new and
ill-defined problem and solution spaces. The default RP in RE is to design a
specification of the system-to-be which (i) is consistent with given
requirements and conditions of its environment, and (ii) together with
environment conditions satisfies requirements. This paper (i) shows that the
Requirements Problem for Adaptive Systems (RPAS) is different from, and is not
a subclass of the default RP, (ii) gives a formal definition of RPAS, and (iii)
discusses implications for future research
What If People Learn Requirements Over Time? A Rough Introduction to Requirements Economics
The overall objective of Requirements Engineering is to specify, in a
systematic way, a system that satisfies the expectations of its stakeholders.
Despite tremendous effort in the field, recent studies demonstrate this is
objective is not always achieved. In this paper, we discuss one particularly
challenging factor to Requirements Engineering projects, namely the change of
requirements. We proposes a rough discussion of how learning and time explain
requirements changes, how it can be introduced as a key variable in the
formulation of the Requirements Engineering Problem, and how this induces costs
for a requirements engineering project. This leads to a new discipline of
requirements economics
Modelling Requirements for Content Recommendation Systems
This paper addresses the modelling of requirements for a content
Recommendation System (RS) for Online Social Networks (OSNs). On OSNs, a user
switches roles constantly between content generator and content receiver. The
goals and softgoals are different when the user is generating a post, as
opposed as replying to a post. In other words, the user is generating instances
of different entities, depending on the role she has: a generator generates
instances of a "post", while the receiver generates instances of a "reply".
Therefore, we believe that when addressing Requirements Engineering (RE) for
RS, it is necessary to distinguish these roles clearly.
We aim to model an essential dynamic on OSN, namely that when a user creates
(posts) content, other users can ignore that content, or themselves start
generating new content in reply, or react to the initial posting. This dynamic
is key to designing OSNs, because it influences how active users are, and how
attractive the OSN is for existing, and to new users. We apply a well-known
Goal Oriented RE (GORE) technique, namely i-star, and show that this language
fails to capture this dynamic, and thus cannot be used alone to model the
problem domain. Hence, in order to represent this dynamic, its relationships to
other OSNs' requirements, and to capture all relevant information, we suggest
using another modelling language, namely Petri Nets, on top of i-star for the
modelling of the problem domain. We use Petri Nets because it is a tool that is
used to simulate the dynamic and concurrent activities of a system and can be
used by both practitioners and theoreticians.Comment: 28 pages, 7 figure
Revisiting the Core Ontology and Problem in Requirements Engineering
In their seminal paper in the ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and
Methodology, Zave and Jackson established a core ontology for Requirements
Engineering (RE) and used it to formulate the "requirements problem", thereby
defining what it means to successfully complete RE. Given that stakeholders of
the system-to-be communicate the information needed to perform RE, we show that
Zave and Jackson's ontology is incomplete. It does not cover all types of basic
concerns that the stakeholders communicate. These include beliefs, desires,
intentions, and attitudes. In response, we propose a core ontology that covers
these concerns and is grounded in sound conceptual foundations resting on a
foundational ontology. The new core ontology for RE leads to a new formulation
of the requirements problem that extends Zave and Jackson's formulation. We
thereby establish new standards for what minimum information should be
represented in RE languages and new criteria for determining whether RE has
been successfully completed.Comment: Appears in the proceedings of the 16th IEEE International
Requirements Engineering Conference, 2008 (RE'08). Best paper awar
Influence of Context on Decision Making during Requirements Elicitation
Requirements engineers should strive to get a better insight into decision
making processes. During elicitation of requirements, decision making
influences how stakeholders communicate with engineers, thereby affecting the
engineers' understanding of requirements for the future information system.
Empirical studies issued from Artificial Intelligence offer an adequate
groundwork to understand how decision making is influenced by some particular
contextual factors. However, no research has gone into the validation of such
empirical studies in the process of collecting needs of the future system's
users. As an answer, the paper empirically studies factors, initially
identified by AI literature, that influence decision making and communication
during requirements elicitation. We argue that the context's structure of the
decision should be considered as a cornerstone to adequately study how
stakeholders decide to communicate or not a requirement. The paper proposes a
context framework to categorize former factors into specific families, and
support the engineers during the elicitation process.Comment: appears in Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on
Acquisition, Representation and Reasoning with Contextualized Knowledge
(ARCOE), 2012, Montpellier, France, held at the European Conference on
Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-12
Aligning a Service Provisioning Model of a Service-Oriented System with the ITIL v.3 Life Cycle
Bringing together the ICT and the business layer of a service-oriented system
(SoS) remains a great challenge. Few papers tackle the management of SoS from
the business and organizational point of view. One solution is to use the
well-known ITIL v.3 framework. The latter enables to transform the organization
into a service-oriented organizational which focuses on the value provided to
the service customers. In this paper, we align the steps of the service
provisioning model with the ITIL v.3 processes. The alignment proposed should
help organizations and IT teams to integrate their ICT layer, represented by
the SoS, and their business layer, represented by ITIL v.3. One main advantage
of this combined use of ITIL and a SoS is the full service orientation of the
company.Comment: This document is the technical work of a conference paper submitted
to the International Conference on Exploring Service Science 1.5 (IESS 2015
- …